Research preview. Independent expert review is pending. The worked analyses are hypothetical. Method and corrections
AIAIGovSpec

Instrument comparison

Compare instruments by what they do, not by the principles they mention.

Similar words can hide different authority, scope, and consequences. The framework gives unlike instruments a common map: which object each acts on, at what level, with what binding force, and what it leaves unresolved.

10 instruments · prototype set
InstrumentForceFamilyActs onLevelEditorial caution
NIST AI RMF 1.0

NIST · Public technical framework

voluntaryRisk frameworksSafeguardsInstitutionsCorporateA framework for practice, not a substitute for legal duties or rights analysis. It acts on safeguards and internal institutions; it does not change external incentives by itself.
OECD AI Principles

OECD · Intergovernmental recommendation

recommendatoryInternational institutionsInstitutionsIncentivesInternationalBroad policy orientation whose meaning depends on domestic implementation. Its incentive effect runs through adherent governments, not directly on firms.
UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendation

UNESCO · Intergovernmental recommendation

recommendatoryRights frameworksInstitutionsSafeguardsInternationalIts breadth is a feature; implementation still requires institutional translation into named safeguards.
EU Artificial Intelligence Act

European Union · Regulation

bindingLawsSafeguardsInstitutionsIncentivesInfrastructuresRegionalObligations and application dates vary by provision; always verify the current legal text and implementation timeline. It acts on incentives through liability exposure and market access, and on infrastructure by using a training-compute threshold as the trigger for systemic-risk obligations on general-purpose model providers (source-level reading of Article 51; passage review pending).
Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI

Council of Europe · International treaty (CETS No. 225)

bindingTreatiesInstitutionsSafeguardsInternationalBinding only for parties for which it has entered into force, and largely framed as obligations on states to adopt measures. Verify signature, ratification, and entry-into-force status before relying on it; the overview page, not the treaty text, was reviewed.
OMB M-25-22 AI acquisition memo

US Office of Management and Budget · Executive branch policy memorandum

bindingProcurementIncentivesSafeguardsNationalBinding on federal agencies, not on the market at large. It works through purchasing power: what vendors must accept to sell to government.
EU Product Liability Directive

European Union · EU directive, transposed into national law

bindingLiabilityIncentivesRegionalApplies from 9 December 2026. It does not set design rules; it changes incentives by assigning the cost of defects.
IndiaAI Mission

Government of India · Cabinet-approved spending programme

voluntaryPublic investment and infrastructure policyInfrastructuresIncentivesNationalA funding programme rather than a rule: participation is voluntary. It acts on who can build AI by changing access to infrastructure.
Canada Directive on Automated Decision-Making

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat · Treasury Board policy instrument

bindingAudits and evaluationsSafeguardsInstitutionsNationalBinds federal departments only. Also in the GovSpec gold set, so its requirements can be traced clause by clause there.
ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system

ISO and IEC · International consensus standard

voluntaryStandardsInstitutionsSafeguardsInternationalVoluntary unless a contract or regulator requires it. Certification shows a process exists, not that a given system is safe.

Instrument families and the objects they act on

From the framework: what each family of instrument contributes, and which object it primarily acts on. A family missing from the register above is a gap in this prototype, not in the field.

Organization and AI-system lifecycle

NIST AI RMF 1.0

Risk management functions and outcomes · Trustworthiness and organizational risk practice

  • Govern
  • Map
  • Measure
  • Manage

International policy and AI actors

OECD AI Principles

Values-based principles and policy recommendations · Trustworthy AI, democratic values, and interoperable policy

  • Set shared principles
  • Guide policymakers
  • Support interoperability

Global public policy

UNESCO AI Ethics Recommendation

Values, principles, and policy action areas · Human dignity, rights, social and environmental well-being

  • Set normative foundation
  • Guide policy action
  • Support readiness assessment

EU market and regulated uses

EU Artificial Intelligence Act

Risk categories, regulated actors, systems, and models · Market rules, safety, fundamental rights, and innovation

  • Prohibit certain practices
  • Set duties
  • Supervise and enforce

Parties' activities within the lifecycle of AI systems

Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI

Obligations of parties, principles, remedies, and procedural safeguards · Human rights, democracy, and the rule of law

  • Bind parties to principles across the AI lifecycle
  • Require documentation and complaint routes for affected persons
  • Establish follow-up on implementation

Federal executive agency AI contracts

OMB M-25-22 AI acquisition memo

Contract terms and solicitations · Competitive markets, data protection and performance

  • Steers AI contract terms
  • Protects government data
  • Limits vendor lock-in
  • Requires performance monitoring

Products placed on the EU market, including software

EU Product Liability Directive

Defective products and the damage they cause · Compensation for harm

  • Defines software as a product
  • No-fault liability for defects
  • Compensation for harmed people

National AI ecosystem

IndiaAI Mission

Public funds for compute, data, models and skills · Access and domestic capability

  • Funds public AI compute
  • Builds a datasets platform
  • Funds startups and skills
  • Backs domestic models

Federal government automated decisions

Canada Directive on Automated Decision-Making

Automated decision systems and their impact level · Administrative fairness and transparency

  • Mandatory impact assessment
  • Published assessment results
  • Expert peer review
  • Mitigations scaled to impact

Any organization that develops, provides or uses AI

ISO/IEC 42001 AI management system

Organizational management system · Repeatable governance practice and certification

  • Management system requirements
  • Third-party certification
  • Continual improvement