Política Nacional de Inteligencia Artificial (Actualización 2024)

Claims that cite this source · 3

1. Source assertion· confidence high· passage checked

   Chile’s national AI policy says Latin America has been under-represented in setting international AI principles and lacks sovereign high-performance compute.

   Used in: International institution, Compute

2. Interpretation· confidence medium· passage checked

   “How societies should” sets the scope wider than a single organisation, where several explicit definitions place governance (Mäntymäki et al., Schneider et al., IAPP, IBM, Japan’s business guidelines). It is closest to Chile’s multi-actor definition of governance and the UN advisory body’s multi-stakeholder framing, and it keeps the question normative: what should be done, not only what is done.

3. Interpretation· confidence high· passage checked

   “How societies should” leaves open who decides and how. Chile’s definition names the actors (government, the private sector, citizens and academia), and the UN advisory body calls for multi-stakeholder collaboration; the AIGovSpec definition names neither and relies on its legitimacy test instead.