Research preview. Independent expert review is pending. The worked analyses are hypothetical. Method and corrections
AIAIGovSpec
Source register

report

Global Trends in AI Governance: Evolving Country Approaches

World Bank · 2024

Open the source

world-bank-2024-global-trends-ai-governance · last checked 2026-10-19 · voice: government · origin: international

Read from the World Bank’s plain-text rendering of the report; page markers are approximate.

Claims that cite this source · 2

  1. Interpretation· confidence medium· passage checked

    Adaptability is common: the OECD, the UN advisory body, Japan, Kenya, the African Union and the World Bank all expect governance to be agile or regularly revised. Acting before arrangements set is rarer. Dafoe urges embedding principles while the stakes are relatively low, and Ojanen et al. draw on Guston’s anticipatory governance (“while effective intervention is still possible”), but none of the definitions compared here builds that timing into the definition of AI governance itself. This is the clause in which AIGovSpec departs most from them.

  2. Interpretation· confidence medium· passage checked

    Where explicit definitions exist, most (nine of thirteen here) pair a set of instruments, such as rules, practices, processes or frameworks, with a purpose clause such as “to ensure” compliance, alignment or responsible use. They describe what governance is made of more often than what it acts on.