Research preview. Independent expert review is pending. The worked analyses are hypothetical. Method and corrections
AIAIGovSpec
Back to learning path
PatternBenefits and harmful patternsemerging

Homogenisation and loss of authorship

A pattern in which AI assistance makes individual work better on some measures while making collective output more alike, and blurs who authored a judgment or a piece of work.

Source-linked claims

source-assertionConfidence: mediumContestability: medium

In an experiment, AI-generated ideas made individual short stories rated more creative, especially for less creative writers, but made the stories more similar to one another.

Our reading: One narrow writing task with one model and non-professional UK participants. The individual gain and the collective loss come from the same study.

Inspect evidence · 1 passage

Passage summaries are paraphrases, not quotations. Open the source to read the full passage.

Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content (opens in a new tab)

Abstract and Results

Access to AI-generated ideas made individual stories rated more novel and useful, especially for less creative writers, but the AI-assisted stories were more similar to one another than stories written by people alone.

Scope note: Randomised online experiment with UK participants writing short stories with one model. Open access; read through Europe PMC (PMC11244532).

Passage checked 2026-10-18 · doshi-hauser-abstract

Provenance

  1. Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content

    Science Advances · scholarship · published 2024-07-12 · Vol. 10, no. 28

    Randomised online experiment with UK participants writing short stories with one model. Open access; read through Europe PMC (PMC11244532).

    doshi-hauser-2024-creativity-diversity · Last checked 2026-10-18 · claims and passages